<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ottonomy.net &#187; english</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ottonomy.net/tag/english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ottonomy.net</link>
	<description>free culture and free gardens by Nate Otto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:55:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Metaphors of Bush&#8217;s 2004 reelection paper</title>
		<link>http://ottonomy.net/2009/09/24/metaphors-of-bushs-2004-reelection-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://ottonomy.net/2009/09/24/metaphors-of-bushs-2004-reelection-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ottonomy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honors college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottonomy.net/2009/09/metaphors-of-bushs-2004-reelection-paper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of my first honors college &#8220;colloquium&#8221; classes, taught by Mark Johnson, I was introduced to his and George Lakoff&#8217;s theory of cognitive metaphor. This paper explores a metaphor of moral strength to evaluate its role in President Bush&#8217;s 2004 reelection victory, which was often publicly attributed to high turnout of &#8220;values voters.&#8221; Since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of my first honors college &#8220;colloquium&#8221; classes, taught by Mark Johnson, I was introduced to his and George Lakoff&#8217;s theory of cognitive metaphor. This paper explores a metaphor of moral strength to evaluate its role in President Bush&#8217;s 2004 reelection victory, which was often publicly attributed to high turnout of &#8220;values voters.&#8221; Since I wrote this paper, the Democrats have still constantly failed to present a cohesive moral framework that justifies their positions (or is it that they still haven&#8217;t come up with a cohesive position?)</p>
<p><a href='http://ottonomy.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Metaphor-Final-Paper-Moral-Strength-and-2004-Election.doc'>Metaphor Final Paper &#8211; Moral Strength and 2004 Election</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ottonomy.net/2009/09/24/metaphors-of-bushs-2004-reelection-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

